Skip to main content

Rendezvous with IITK leadership @ Santa Clara, CA:
Meeting with IITK potential faculty candidates


[No, this is not a follow-up to my previous post on board toppers, IIT-JEE toppers, etc. Before my relatively poor memory gives away last weekend’s experiences, I thought I’d write them down.]


“It’s like a modern day arranged marriage in India where the boy’s family visits the girl’s family, and the girl has to say ‘yes’ before the marriage can be arranged. We are the boy’s family now and you are the girl’s.”

A (surprisingly) pleasant sense of humor from the IITK leadership set a very relaxing, laid-back and informal mood for a highly informative and enriching session. It was a sunny and warm afternoon outside 2903 Bunker Hill Lane, Santa Clara in California on June 16 (Saturday). The leadership of IITK including the director, dean of research and planning, chair of EE department, etc. had arrived for a unique event organized in conjunction with the IITK alumni association in USA. Besides celebrating a reunion among IITK alumni, there was an agenda of having an interactive session with potential faculty candidates for IITK. There were about twenty such candidates (including myself) who got a chance to ‘see’ the finer details of IITK.

The event was partitioned into two sessions, one on Saturday afternoon and the other on Sunday morning till post noon. During the first session which was also decked by an inspirational Narayana Murthy speech, we were updated on the current status of IITK, and why the event was organized after all. So I came to know that IITK has the highest endowment fund among all IITs which is around $45 million with IITB being at second place with an endowment fund of around $22 million. It seems IITK is facing a faculty crunch (I guess it’s true for most of the other IITs as well) with an estimated 250 vacancies to be filled in the next 7.5 years. So the leadership at IITK aims at hiring around 30-40 faculty members every year. Now that is of course a challenging task I believe, but they said that they would not dilute the quality of faculty members to meet this end. Hence the leadership was here in the USA to interact with potential candidates helping us understand the application process, as well as encouraging us to apply for faculty positions in IITK. Of course, this interaction has absolutely nothing to do with the chances of an application being accepted or rejected, because that depends on the candidate’s merit and the specific department to which he/she is applying, we were told.  

I came to know of certain interesting (and appealing!) facts about working in IITK. The most appealing one was of course the extra Rs. 25k per month that IITK pays to all new faculty members irrespective of discipline or anything, over and above the usual pay of like Rs. 65k per month. Now Rs. 90k per month is quite a nice salary for a starting assistant professor J. I am being lightly humorous of course, because money is not the primary incentive for people (or researchers) like us. We, researchers, as far as I can conclude, take much more pleasure and satisfaction in finding things out and doing new things than earning fat paychecks, or else why will young PhDs (in engineering) give up jobs that pay more than $100k/year in the USA to go to India for a Rs.65k per month job? Money is no doubt quintessential for survival. If my family has an emergency, I need money. A decent lifestyle in any place on the world necessitates money. However, its charm doesn’t match the pleasure of finding things out (besides that of staying close to family in IndiaJ). Another nice thing about IITK is that the leadership explained about their help and assistance in solving typical two body problems of the candidates, which fortunately, I am not worried about for myself as of nowJ.

The second session on Sunday was a presentation session, where each candidate gave a brief talk about his research work, his research interests, on why he wanted to join IITK and what his plans would be for research and teaching at IITK. It was really informative, encouraging and engaging as well. I was delighted to see quite a few of the candidates willing to set up labs in India thereby boosting my levels of optimism. This is because I am an experimentalist and require a lot of equipments and lab spaces to conduct research, and it was really nice to meet and get inspired from quite a few experimentalists ready to go to India for faculty positions! I read somewhere that 80% of the dissertations that come out of India every year are theoretical in nature. No offense to theory or simulation which form a vital part of any research, but I strongly believe that unless we have a strong experimental research base in the institutes and universities across India for developing quality and ‘technologically relevant’ work, we Indians are never going to be anywhere close to USA or China in terms of technological prowess and leadership. And no, I am not speaking of software programs and IT industry now.

Finally we had a one-on-one chat with the director, professors and the dean and they all answered our multiple queries ranging from availability of lab spaces to the scene of securing grants from DST. I found the IITK leadership very rejuvenating and inspiring, and I left with a pretty high and impressive opinion about the various aspects of working at IITK.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blabbers on a Friday (late) night Or Random s**t thoughts crossing an idle mind

 [Disclaimer: I do not own the copyright of the images below. They are obtained by randomly 'google searching'.] It’s another Friday night of the month, late night actually. It’s almost 1:30 am (and so it’s actually Saturday). And I am sober. Friday night, to most people, is the most awaited moment of the week. Why? Of course man! It’s the threshold of the highly anticipated weekend of relaxation, of spending more time with friends and family and of course of not having to deal with words like ‘boss’ or managers! Besides, who loves Monday mornings? Monday mornings are the gateways to a long week of work! And that sucks, doesn’t it? Hence, Friday nights are the times when undergrads party hard with beer, girls (for straight guys) and loud music that will probably crack the sky! Friday nights are when typical grad students seep a beer or two at a bar complaining how frustrating PhD life can be.  And I am sitting in my apartment, having finished watching ‘Love Aaj ...

What you feel exactly midway in your PhD!

  I was reading a very recent article “Graduate students: Aspirations and anxieties” published in Nature Jobs ( http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/2011/110728/pdf/nj7357-533a.pdf ) which was comical but very true at the same time. It reflects what I and many of my colleagues (or personal friends) are feeling right now as I am writing this blog. The article, which consisted of statistical results based on a survey of about 5000 PhD students scattered across a dozen countries, shows how with each passing year, in an average five year period of a typical PhD student, things like - satisfaction in one’s PhD, interest in one’s work, guidance received from one’s adviser and probability of commencing a research career after PhD – decrease gradually. The dip is the sharpest in 3 rd year although it rises a little bit in 4 th year for some parameters and eventually decreases for the final year. I am going to complete my 3 rd year of PhD in a month, which speaks about my mentality, att...
Board Toppers, IIT-JEE toppers & personal reflections [Oh No! Not another blog on IIT-JEE, please!] In the recent past, I’ve come across many blogs (besides debates in TV channels, newspapers, etc.) on why not to scrap the existing IIT-JEE, and a few blogs on why to support the change. These blogs are written by intellectuals and academicians of the highest caliber including professors of IIT (and other institutes), IIT alumni, present IIT students, etc. etc. and are being ‘hotly’ followed in terms of follow-up comments, debates, discussions.   I am the most unworthy person in terms of trying to write a blog on it, firstly because, I did not study in an IIT (I even failed to clear the then-existing screening test J ) and secondly, since I never studied in an IIT and do not know the level of teaching and student quality (both must be very high, I believe), hence I cannot comprehend what changes – positive or negative – the proposed change in the exam might bri...